| Battery Capacity | 2600mAh |
|---|---|
| Battery Type | Integrated |
| Charging Type | USB Type-C |
| Coil Resistance | 0.4ohm, 0.6ohm, 1.0ohm |
| Coil Types | Mesh |
| Made In | China |
| Tank Capacity | 2ml |
| Weight | 183g |
| Height | 12cm (4.5") |
| Width | 3.9cm (1.5") |
| Depth | 2.5cm (1.0") |
£47.99
The Aspire Rover Plus vape kit is ideal for any vaper who wants a simple, yet stylish option for sub ohm vaping. This sleek kit houses a built-in 2600mAh battery with a 5-40W variable output, balancing power with battery life and lasting around a day between recharges. The included AF coils allow you to switch between RDTL (Restricted Direct To Lung) and DTL (Direct To Lung) vaping.
Get started at the click of a button and customise the Rover Plus with a range of mode. Control power output with Variable Wattage and Voltage modes, and swap between a lighter or stronger vape. If you’re looking for the most powerful vape possible, activate Bypass mode. Customer Power Settings mode lets you set a series of wattages that your kit will reach every time you vape, for a completely personalised inhale. There’s even Temperature Control mode if you're looking to try different heat levels and change the flavour of your vape.
The 2ml AF Tank features a sliding top-fill mechanism, so you won’t need to remove your tank to top it up and the included 0.4 Ohm DTL and 0.6 Ohm RDTL AF coils will produce large amounts of vapour. The 0.4 Ohm version creating the largest clouds out of the two. We recommend pairing both coils with a 70% VG vape juice or higher. There’s also an MTL (Mouth To Lung) 1.0 Ohm coil (available separately) that should be used with a 50/50 e-liquid.
(53)
Do you have a question about this product? Why not ask our expert team.
By 98cal from Guildford
I am glad that the Aspire Rover has made a come back. I miss the original Rover kit but this is a lot heavier than the old version. Also the original used the nautilus x coils which were great but now using the AF coils which in my opinion are not the best and would have worked better using the Nautilus x or BVC. Overall, stunning looking device but areas to improve on
